EPA to Alaskans: Stop Burning Wood!

EPA To Alaskans In Sub-Zero Temps: Stop Burning Wood To Keep Warm

In Alaska’s interior, where it can reach -50 degrees Fahrenheit in winter, the EPA wants Image result for cold temperaturepeople to stop burning wood. But it’s just about their only feasible way to stay warm.

In Jack London’s famous short story, “To Build A Fire,” a man freezes to death because he underestimates the cold in America’s far north and cannot build a proper fire. The unnamed man—a chechaquo, what Alaska natives call newcomers—is accompanied by a wolf-dog that knows the danger of the cold and is wholly indifferent to the fate of the man. “This man did not know cold. Possibly, all the generations of his ancestry had been ignorant of cold, of real cold, of cold 107 degrees below freezing point. But the dog knew; all its ancestry knew, and it had inherited the knowledge.”Related imageIf only the bureaucrats in Washington DC knew what the wolf-dog knew. But alas, now comes the federal government to tell the inhabitants of Alaska’s interior that, really, they should not be building fires to keep themselves warm during the winter. The New York Times reports the Environmental Protection Agency could soon declare the Alaskan cities of Fairbanks and North Pole, which have a combined population of about 100,000, in “serious” noncompliance of the Clean Air Act early next year.

Of the earnest bureaucrats at the EPA fretting over the smoke from Alaskans’ wood stoves in the dead of winter, we might say something similar: they understand facts but not the significance of them. Burning wood when it’s -20 degrees outside will indeed cause the smoke to descend, and breathing such air is admittedly not very healthy. What the EPA doesn’t accept, or even grasp, is man’s place in the universe: in the face of Alaska’s deadly cold interior, there’s only so much we can do. So we build a fire.

More here.

Related

The EPA Targeted Fairbanks Borrough 
The EPA Came for the Navajo

 

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. We suppose that if people wish to live in the kind of Third-World pollution the citizens of China and Mongolia put up with, they should be permitted to do so. With so many other choices available, a number of questions remain as to Why people would wish this status of living upon themselves. The EPA does a lot of good work, but, no, they can’t legislate good sense. As Alaska residents, we are very aware of matters of cold and high fuel costs. We are also very aware that there are many other responsible choices (other than simply digging their heals in) that the residents of Fairbanks could be making.

      1. We’ll pass, papapound. We encourage folks to look into this issue themselves and to draw their own conclusions. Our point is simply that in some some nations -Mongolia and China being two examples – this kind of air pollution is normal. We Alaskans live in a democracy and people are free to choose their air quality… and some of those choices befuddle us. As we say, there are a number of other choices people in could be making. To each their own.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s